Archive for October, 2011:

The Thank You Economy

October 31, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

AN AGGRESSIVE LOOK AT SERVING YOUR CUSTOMERS

In 1997, Gary Vaynerchuk, the owner of a family liquor store who had just
launched an online wine retailer called WineLibrary.com, explained
to a local Chamber of Commerce audience why Internet retailing was the next
great frontier in business. Vaynerchuk had been preceded on stage by a
corporate VP who, using a sophisticated powerpoint presentation with scores of
statistics, explained why e-commerce would never amount to much. “How many
of you have heard of Amazon,” the VP asked the audience. A few raised
their hands. How many people, he continued, would really end their
relationships with their local bookstores or the local Barnes & Noble in
order to buy books online? Most of the audience sat motionless. At the end of
the presentation, the VP introduced Vaynerchuk with the following words:
“This kid’s now going to tell you how he’s going to sell wine on the
Internet. How many of you here would ever buy wine on the Internet?” One
or two people raised their hands, to the smug satisfaction of the VP.

Reading the following message by Vaynerchuk reminds me of developmental feedback from
superiors I’ve received on occasion for investing time, attention and energy on
the environment in which we worked in organizations from North Carolina to
Mexico to Puerto Rico to Colorado.  My
direct manager would ask something like “why bother with putting a $2000
barbeque pit in the back yard?  It just
seems like a waste of time and money to me…”
The very question itself told me I was swimming upstream by even making
them aware of the things I was doing to improve employee commitment.  I would employ a “seek forgiveness rather
than ask permission” approach on occasion, but would always look for ways, no
matter how small, to let the employees know I was there in large part to
support their success.  Vaynerchuk is
onto something here and I’m sure you’d find it a good read.

Vaynerchuk recounts the story of “Mr. Powerpoint,” as he calls the
VP, in his new book, The Thank You Economy.
Of course, Amazon did not disappear, despite the fact that Mr. Powerpoint
predicted that people would soon be saying, “Remember Amazon?” And
Vaynerchuk’s own Web site continues to thrive. Vaynerchuk is the author of Crush
It!
and is now a principle in Vaynermedia, a consultancy specializing in
social media branding.

It’s easy to chuckle at the shortsightedness of the smug VP, but, as Vaynerchuk
passionately argues in his book, too many businesses are making the same
mistake today with social media. Using a variety of excuses (social media is
too young, there’s no ROI, etc), many businesses underestimate or dismiss the
impact of Facebook, Twitter, iPhone apps and all the other tools that have empowered
customers in ways that have not been seen since the heyday of small town
commerce in the early 20th century.

Vaynerchuk draws the title of the book from the concept that, just as when most
people did all of their shopping at the stores on the main street of their
small towns or in their city neighborhoods, today’s businesses can no longer
afford to treat customers badly. Word gets around — not through small town
gossip at the PTA meeting or country club, but through the growing multitude of
social media channels. Word of mouth lost its voice when people moved from
small towns to sprawling suburbs and severed their connection to local
merchants, Vaynerchuk writes. It has found its voice again — and businesses
better start paying attention.

The Thank You Economy Culture

According to Vaynerchuk, surviving in the Thank You Economy requires a culture
that puts employees and customers ahead of everything else. This is a point
that Vaynerchuk repeats on numerous occasions. Although it is one of the
guiding principles of his philosophy, readers may tire of Vaynerchuk’s pounding
this point.

He doesn’t suggest that all companies should start to act like Silicon Valley
start-ups. If you’re a conservative company, act like a conservative company.
As Vaynerchuk explains, “I care more about my employees than I do about my
customers, and I care more about my customers than I do about breathing.”
The Thank You Economy company empowers its employees so that they, in turn, can
offer better one-and-one customer service — with social media playing a key
part in the effort.

“Create a culture of openness,” Vaynerchuk urges. “Let your
employees blog and tweet as much as they like… And let them be themselves.
Authenticity is a huge part of what makes social media initiatives work.”

Is Mr. Powerpoint Listening?

Traditional media still plays an important role in the Thank You Economy. In
fact, the best companies will layer social media on top of traditional media —
running a television ad that refers viewers to a Facebook page, for example.

Bolstering his arguments with scores of examples from his own companies and
from nationally known corporations, as well as in-depth case studies of lesser
known but successful enterprises, Vaynerchuk provides compelling illustrations
that social media is a vital component in the success of today’s businesses.

Why the next Steve Jobs could be an Indian

October 28, 2011

Posted by in Blog with no comments

This is an interesting editorial touching on both cultural globalization and how US immigration policies are impacting competitiveness. As executive search consultants, we see this problem through the eyes of our search clients and the challenges they face in getting the talent they need. Perhaps our next Steve Jobs will be found outside the US? Read more »

Leadership Formula for Success

October 17, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Have you ever
taken a course and placed the workbook on the shelf, never looking at it
again?  If your answer is “yes” just as
it is for most of us, it just means you haven’t either held yourself
accountable or you haven’t been held accountable by your manager.  The following leadership formula for success
is a way to get more out of your training investments.  Since taking a workshop delivered by
Introspect International in 2003, I’ve been able to better reinforce effective
use of training, but it was more about the changes in me rather than the
changes in others.

According to Scott
Crandall, Principal of Trinity-Lincoln
Consulting
, starting around July every year, training departments begin
receiving e-mails and phone calls around the same topic:

“Such-and-such
course is on my annual plan, and I need to get signed up.”

This should remind
us of a statistic from the British consulting firm Lane4:

At least 80% of
all corporate training cannot be linked
back to any performance improvement, let alone a business-related improvement
resulting in Return on Investment.

Considering that
over $134 Billion is spent annually, that’s a staggering
implication.

The
Secret Formula

However,
there issolution.
Consider this equation:

ET + LR = BC
–>  ROI

It means Effective
Training
(ET) and Leadership
Reinforcement
(LR) result in Changed Behavior
(BC), which leads to Return on Investment
(ROI).

The corollary is
also true: Effective Training (or development) without
Leadership Reinforcement will NOT result in Changed
Behavior
or ROI.

Ideally, the equation
would read:  ET + IA = BC –>  ROI, where IA stood for “Individual
Application
”.

In other words, if
people came back from training, eager to apply the new techniques
they learned (and actually did it!), effective training (or development) might
be all that was needed.

Instead, isn’t
this the more common post-training response:

Back from 2 or 3
days away, people realize they’ve got 90 or 100 e-mails to wade through, two
dozen voicemails, and they’re behind!  They glance wistfully
at the training notebook, swearing to look at it “as soon as things calm down a
little,” and up on the shelf it goes, never to be seen again.

Honestly, isn’t
that what most post-training becomes?

The evidence says
this is common for over 80% of us.

Two
Conversations and a Follow Up Plan

So how
can we change it?

Knowing that the
“IA” – by itself – is unrealistic. As leaders. we must provide the
“LR”.

One question we
need to look at then is what exactly makes up “leadership reinforcement.”
Leadership Reinforcement, at its essence,
consists of three things: two conversations and
an accountability plan.

Conversation Number
1

The first
conversation should be an outgrowth of the annual plan. What training or
development actions did you agree upon with the person?  Assuming that the
plan itself is effective, within a week or two before the person attends a
training course or developmental opportunity, you need to have a conversation.

This talk should
initially
:

  • Discuss the developmental
    issues
    with the person
  • Agree why you
    want them
    to attend the training in the first place
  • Express your expectations for what
    you want them
    to get out of the training
  • Tell them to what they should pay
    particular attention
  • Discuss their
    reaction
    and expectations
  • Convey how you expect their behavior
    to change
    when they return.

In other words, if
you want a particular output, you must ensure that the inputs
are correct.

The bottom line,
however, is this: When your employees leave to attend training, they must know
precisely what your joint expectations are, what to pay particular attention
to, and they should begin thinking – during training – about how they’ll apply
it.

In this way your
employees will be more focused when they attend training or participate in
developmental activities.  They’ll be more engaged, listening and watching
more intently, asking better questions, doing their homework, and making sure
they’ll meet your joint expectations.  People at training courses would be
there for a purpose (one they understood and agreed with.)

Everybody wins in those situations.

Conversation Number
2

The second
conversation happens once the employee gets back.

  • You should ask them to identify
    the “Big Rocks”
    that they got from the training.
  • What were the major
    impacts
    they received?
  • What are they going
    to do
    about them?
  • Specifically, how are they going to perform
    their job differently
    than before they went
    away?
  • Have this conversation
    in detail
  • Make notes
  • Set dates for specific accomplishments
  • Then follow up!

If Action A was to
be completed by September 15, check in with them on the 15th (not
the 16th) to see how they did.  Hold their feet to the fire,
closely verify the details.  Check randomly after that date, but make sure
the committed actions or changes are truly completed, and implemented to your
satisfaction.  Praise their efforts and reward their
accomplishments.  Don’t allow their completed commitments to pass in
ignored or overlooked silence.

This silence is
deafening in the corporate world.

The Plan

This reinforcement
method is a golden opportunity to do several things.

  1. It improves your people’s
    performance
    (and the business performance of your team)
    and makes them more productive employees.
  2. Praise and feedback are the
    greatest motivators
    there are
  3. Motivated employees have higher
    morale
    and productivity
  4. Satisfied people stay, so your
    attrition
    , recruiting, and related
    costs
    are lower
  5. Higher morale and productivity
    brings improved business results

I don’t know about
you, but I don’t see any downside to “Leadership Reinforcement.”

Naturally Selected

October 4, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

In the overcrowded field of leadership literature, Mark Van Vugt and Anjana Ahuja
present a fascinating and unique look at how evolutionary science explains why
our leaders act as they do, why we as humans are programmed to be followers or
leaders, and why we pick the leaders that we pick.

 

I’ve always believed that people don’t leave businesses or companies, with some exceptions
of course.  People leave people.  People also flock to people they like to work
for or around.

The Basics of Evolutionary Leadership Theory

Building on leadership insights from a variety of fields, including psychology,
biology, neuroscience, economics, anthropology and primatology, Van Vugt and
Ahuja contend in this book that our patterns and behaviors related to
leadership and followership evolved over the course of human evolution.

As explained in their prologue, the themes and conclusions in the book, which
together form what the authors call their evolutionary leadership theory (ELT),
are not “balanced precariously on a froth of anecdotes and parable but
built on a solid foundation of rigorous observations and experimental
data.” Much of the research was conducted by Van Vugt, a professor of
psychology at VU University Amsterdam and a research associate at the University of Oxford. The book benefits greatly,
however, from the participation of journalist Ahuja, a science columnist and
feature writer who also holds a PhD in space physics. Whether revealing the
politics behind chimpanzee behavior or using game theory to explain how prehistoric
hunters on the African savannah survived, the writing is clear, compelling and
involving.

One of the many insights offered by the authors is that humans are programmed
to be followers. It is a question of life or death. On the African savannah two
million years ago, those who “followed” were more likely to survive.
And since our going-it-alone ancestors often died, it was those with the
follower genes who reproduced, creating more and more people with follower
genes, the authors write. When you have followers, of course, you need leaders:
someone to follow. Thus, the rise of followership gave birth to the rise of
leadership.

The Mismatched Hypothesis

If the psychological foundation of leadership evolved from the needs of our
human ancestors on the African savannah two million years ago, how does that
help us choose the leaders we need for our 21st century lives? The answer from
the authors: It often doesn’t. That is the reason for what they call the
Mismatch Hypothesis. Our brains are hardwired to use criteria from the savannah
that no longer applies. Today, a person who is tall has a great advantage in
seeking a leadership role over a small person. How many U.S.
presidents, for example, have been short? Yet stature hardly plays a role in
the keen intellect, decision-making capabilities and relationship skills that
are at the heart of good leadership.

Finding Natural Leaders

The authors conclude the book with a series of lessons to be learned from their
evolutionary leadership theory. The most successful leaders today will be what
the authors call Natural Leaders: those who can appeal to the positive elements
of our ancestral psychology while disarming the negative elements of that
psychology (leaders rely too often on dominant behavior). The practical
applications of the book, however, are not confined to this final chapter.
Every chapter in Naturally Selected
offers readers a new perspective on leadership that will guide and enrich their
leadership decisions, both as leaders and as followers.

 

In my opinion, natural leaders are those that are able to get people to follow them
willingly.  As the authors, I believe
that these leaders are born in most cases.
I also believe that one can learn to emulate their style and approach.  This explains why successful coaches are able
to graduate eventual head coaches under their leadership.  It also explains why ex-CEO Jack Welch was
able to retire while GE continued to flourish.

 

I my case, I can’t claim that I was always the leader I am today.  Before I turned 30, I had been known to copy
poor leadership behaviors.  I didn’t feel
right in the moment, though, when I was getting upset in the workplace.  Watching and learning from the impact of my
behavior on others and learning from different cultures over time helped to
reinforce the right way to bring out the best in people.  That was more comfortable for me personally
and I grew to enjoy the role of a leader as I approached 40.

Affiliations

IACPR
Pinnacle Society
NAPS

Global Partners

Madison MacArthur
Toronto, Ontario

Our Canadian partner in IRC Global Executive Search was founded in 1994 and was featured in Business Week's Most Influential Headhunters in the World List!



DRH-Talent Search
Sao Paulo, Brazil

Our Brazilian partner in IRC Global Executive Search was founded in 2001. DRH is led by Hamilton Teixeira, a former C-level executive of Kellogg, Bausch & Lomb, Timex, and Rayovac.

Testimonials

Testimonials

Connect With Us!


 

Want to speak with a live person? Call (619) 661-2585 between the hours of 8:30am and 5:30pm (Pacific Standard Time) Monday through Friday.

823 Anchorage Place
Chula Vista, CA, 91914