Posts tagged 'Leaders':

Do You Have the SPACE to Do it?

March 27, 2012

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

I’m often asked to give a plan of attack when taking on a new
assignment.  While there have been
thousands of books written on the subject, successful leadership requires an
organized and thoughtful approach from the start.  This approach can be concisely summarized in
an interview, but it takes up to a year to fully implement and ensure you’re on
the right track.  I call it the make SPACE
approach.

Strategy:  All organizations require a strategy so they
know where they’re going in the first place.
This includes a Vision, where the organization sees itself in the
future.  It also includes a Mission, how
the organization intends to get there or its purpose for existing.  The key components of speed, quality and cost
also come into play when putting together a strategic plan.  The organization must decide in which of
these areas will it strive to be “best in class” and in which areas is it sufficient
to be competitive.  Trying to be
everything to everyone can get a company in trouble, but failing at one of the
above to at least be competitive is also dangerous.

Process:  Organizations need a “road map” for employees
to function over time.  They must know
what they’re supposed to be doing and how they’re supposed to be doing it.  This includes systems and processes that it
takes to complete basic functions such as payroll, billing and accounts payable
for example.  And all company processes
need to be documented and employees must be doing what is documented.  Early stage companies are naturally in a
state of “flux”, but they also must invest time in this part… even if it
changes frequently.

Accountability:  The organization must establish measurable
and attainable goals for all to see and understand.  Those goals must clearly tie back to the
Vision and Mission.  More specifically, I’m
referring to an individual report card at all levels.  When things go well, celebrate it and when
things don’t meet expectations, corrective actions must be taken.  A company without this focus may have the
best and brightest employees, but if they’re all going in different directions,
they’ll have a much smaller chance of reaching the goals.

Continual Improvement:  All that we do can be improved or refined in
some way over time.  Without a continual
improvement approach to what the organization does, things will stagnate, people
will get bored and results will erode.  I
would say that one percent of your team has to have this as their only goals –
process, product or service improvement.
Some would use the techniques such as Lean or Six Sigma to accomplish
this and that’s fine.  It doesn’t matter
what you call it.  What matters is that a
culture of continually evolving to meet and beat the expectations of the
customer, internal or external, is required to continue to grow.  The most successful organizations have this
as component of their DNA.

Environment:  Last, but not least… if your organization has
people in it, this may be the most important part of the plan.  Good employees do well.  Willing employees do great.  And you’ll never know what the employees are capable
of until they are willing.  The environment
it takes to succeed long term is an environment where people are a key
component of the equation.  How does this
happen?  I know it seems like I’m
oversimplifying, but ask them.  That’s it.
Ok, you have to take some action on some of the things they have on
their mind.  You also have to be mindful
of the highly effective interpersonal habits – these can be found in countless
places.  They key to being successful in
this area is that you have to be willing to invest in them through building
trust, effectively listening, building a collaborative culture and respectfully
resolving conflict.

It’s as straightforward as can be, but you’d be surprised at the number of
organizations you’ve worked in that leave out key components.  For sure, all of these areas require
investment, but I’ve seen organizations fail that left out just one of
them.  Is there enough SPACE
in your schedule be successful?

Share

How Does Leadership Happen?

March 19, 2012

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Cindy McCauley from the Center for Creative Leadership hits the nail on the head
when we she answers the question “How does leadership happen?”  She has a way of simplifying the concept leadership
and the attributes that are apparent when leadership is present.  Without any of the three important outcomes
she speaks of below, leadership just ain’t gonna happen!

In some of my successful assignments in Latin America (Mexico and Puerto
Rico), I may not have realized it, but I was constantly trying to make things
happen.  I realized that we needed
purpose, consistency and commitment to succeed.
Cindy puts another and, I’ll admit, more concise way.  Read on and you’ll see what I mean.

The list of “what makes a good leader” is a long one. “It’s
as if we’ve taken every positive human quality and made it into a requirement
for effective leaders,” says Cindy McCauley.

“It’s time to step back and take a different approach,” McCauley
asserts in Making
Leadership Happen
, a new CCL white paper.

Instead of focusing only on individual leaders and their capabilities, we
need to examine how the whole system is involved in making leadership happen.
We need to look at dynamics like the exchanges between managers and employees,
the interactions among team members, the quality of relationships throughout
the organization and the enactment of organizational processes.

How would you know if leadership is happening in a team, in a workgroup, on
a task force, or across the organization? Look for three important outcomes:
direction, alignment and commitment (DAC).

Direction is agreement on what the group is trying to achieve
together. Alignment is effective coordination and integration of the
different aspects of the work so that it fits together in service of the shared
direction. Commitment is when people are making the success of the
collective (not just their individual success) a personal priority.

“We think the only way to know if leadership has happened is to look
for the presence of these three outcomes,” McCauley explains.

So how do you, a manager, make leadership happen in your organization? Here
are three important strategies:

Pay attention to whether leadership is happening. Start
looking for evidence of DAC. By paying attention to outcomes, you will not only
begin to discern where more leadership is needed, but will also start to see
the kinds of processes and interactions that are producing the desired levels
of direction, alignment and commitment.

Make more leadership happen. First, when you notice that
there aren’t many leadership processes in place, create them. For example, do
you need to meet more regularly with your peers to prioritize work in a
matrixed organization (to create more alignment)?

Second, when there are useful leadership processes in place, make sure
people have the skills to participate in them effectively. When a new strategic
initiative is being launched, will your staff be able to take part in (not just
show up to) the town meetings the CEO is holding (to create more shared
direction)?

And finally, when existing leadership processes no longer seem to be
producing the needed direction, alignment and commitment, explore new ones.
Does a more diverse group of people need to be involved (to create more
direction)? Are more honest conversations about proposed changes needed (to
create more commitment)? Are clearer accountabilities needed (to create more
alignment)?

Improve your own ability to participate in the making of leadership.
Back to those long lists of leader capabilities. It is useful to continue to
deepen and broaden your individual skills and abilities. With a broader
repertoire of capabilities you’ll be able to participate more effectively in a
wide range of leadership processes. Often the difficult question is “Where
should I focus my development efforts?”

One lens for examining this question is DAC. If there was one place in your
organization where you would desperately like to see more DAC, where would that
be? Then what would you need to get better at so that more leadership happens
in that setting?

Finally, don’t undertake these three strategies alone! Talk to people about
where DAC is happening and where it’s not; enlist others in your experiments
with new leadership processes; seek input on how to improve your own
capabilities. Leadership is shared work – at the end of the day, you can only
make it happen with others.

Share

I’m Sorry

November 28, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Sorry seems to be the hardest
word… so says Elton John.  When was the
last time you said you were sorry?  Most
of us avoid it like the plague.  The good
news is that we don’t need to make apologies if we don’t make any mistakes or
have the need to say we’re sorry.  Right.  Making mistakes is an important part of being
human; therefore, we’re obligated on many levels to apologize for things both personal
and business-related.

Personal apologies:  We use these because it’s the right thing to
do, but also because we have a moral obligation to do so.  When we apologize, it shows that we care
enough about the other person to make the effort.  To very few people, it comes easy.  To all of us, it’s needed.

Business apologies:  Some believe these are also because it’s the right thing to do.  I believe it’s more and more because it’s the
smart thing to do.  The apology is often offered because the
business relationship can be improved by it.
In other words, it’s in our self-interest to do so.

In either case, the apology must
be sincere.  You see, we all have these
built in BS detectors that go haywire when someone is apologizing and they don’t
seem to mean it or really own it.
That can even make things worse.  Here’s
a checklist on what I’d consider a good apology:

-         Do it right away.
This will serve to get things out there and rebuild the relationship
more easily than allowing it to fester into something bigger.

-         Acknowledge the issue and the impact of it.  This is the first step toward regaining trust.

-         Own the issue.  Take responsibility.

-         Express sincere and authentic regret about it.

-         Explain what you’ll do to make it right.  Or sometimes it’s best to ask the other
person for ideas on how you can make it right… then be prepared to do it, no
matter how small.  I say small because most people won’t push you
too hard when you’re making an apology.
They’ll normally appreciate the gesture and allow you to “bow out
gracefully”… that is unless it’s a repetitive thing for you.

The apology, after all, isn’t about you.  It’s
not to help you with the guilt, although it may help with that.  It’s for the other person or the business
partner that’s been wronged. The next time you have the opportunity to
apologize, be empathetic.  Ask yourself “how
would I react to this apology?”  Then
make the investment in the personal or business relationship and say it like
you really mean it.  Or they’ll know
better.

Share

Naturally Selected

October 4, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

In the overcrowded field of leadership literature, Mark Van Vugt and Anjana Ahuja
present a fascinating and unique look at how evolutionary science explains why
our leaders act as they do, why we as humans are programmed to be followers or
leaders, and why we pick the leaders that we pick.

 

I’ve always believed that people don’t leave businesses or companies, with some exceptions
of course.  People leave people.  People also flock to people they like to work
for or around.

The Basics of Evolutionary Leadership Theory

Building on leadership insights from a variety of fields, including psychology,
biology, neuroscience, economics, anthropology and primatology, Van Vugt and
Ahuja contend in this book that our patterns and behaviors related to
leadership and followership evolved over the course of human evolution.

As explained in their prologue, the themes and conclusions in the book, which
together form what the authors call their evolutionary leadership theory (ELT),
are not “balanced precariously on a froth of anecdotes and parable but
built on a solid foundation of rigorous observations and experimental
data.” Much of the research was conducted by Van Vugt, a professor of
psychology at VU University Amsterdam and a research associate at the University of Oxford. The book benefits greatly,
however, from the participation of journalist Ahuja, a science columnist and
feature writer who also holds a PhD in space physics. Whether revealing the
politics behind chimpanzee behavior or using game theory to explain how prehistoric
hunters on the African savannah survived, the writing is clear, compelling and
involving.

One of the many insights offered by the authors is that humans are programmed
to be followers. It is a question of life or death. On the African savannah two
million years ago, those who “followed” were more likely to survive.
And since our going-it-alone ancestors often died, it was those with the
follower genes who reproduced, creating more and more people with follower
genes, the authors write. When you have followers, of course, you need leaders:
someone to follow. Thus, the rise of followership gave birth to the rise of
leadership.

The Mismatched Hypothesis

If the psychological foundation of leadership evolved from the needs of our
human ancestors on the African savannah two million years ago, how does that
help us choose the leaders we need for our 21st century lives? The answer from
the authors: It often doesn’t. That is the reason for what they call the
Mismatch Hypothesis. Our brains are hardwired to use criteria from the savannah
that no longer applies. Today, a person who is tall has a great advantage in
seeking a leadership role over a small person. How many U.S.
presidents, for example, have been short? Yet stature hardly plays a role in
the keen intellect, decision-making capabilities and relationship skills that
are at the heart of good leadership.

Finding Natural Leaders

The authors conclude the book with a series of lessons to be learned from their
evolutionary leadership theory. The most successful leaders today will be what
the authors call Natural Leaders: those who can appeal to the positive elements
of our ancestral psychology while disarming the negative elements of that
psychology (leaders rely too often on dominant behavior). The practical
applications of the book, however, are not confined to this final chapter.
Every chapter in Naturally Selected
offers readers a new perspective on leadership that will guide and enrich their
leadership decisions, both as leaders and as followers.

 

In my opinion, natural leaders are those that are able to get people to follow them
willingly.  As the authors, I believe
that these leaders are born in most cases.
I also believe that one can learn to emulate their style and approach.  This explains why successful coaches are able
to graduate eventual head coaches under their leadership.  It also explains why ex-CEO Jack Welch was
able to retire while GE continued to flourish.

 

I my case, I can’t claim that I was always the leader I am today.  Before I turned 30, I had been known to copy
poor leadership behaviors.  I didn’t feel
right in the moment, though, when I was getting upset in the workplace.  Watching and learning from the impact of my
behavior on others and learning from different cultures over time helped to
reinforce the right way to bring out the best in people.  That was more comfortable for me personally
and I grew to enjoy the role of a leader as I approached 40.

Share

Charisma

August 2, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

 I was often asked how to be more charismatic when I was working closely with
managers at all levels.  I used to say,
“Be yourself and good things will happen”.
Well, that doesn’t work for everyone.
Having charisma takes effort…  and
it takes more for some than others.
Read more »

Share

Strategy (two part series)

June 27, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Setting strategy isn’t the same as leading strategy. Even the best strategist can falter when it comes to implementing and sustaining the right direction for the business.  And it’s not just about the planning.  It’s also about the doing.

According to the Center for Creative Leadership, statistics indicate that only from 4 to 7 percent of leaders exhibit strategic skills, a woefully inadequate amount given the demands of organizations in today’s environment, notes Kate Beatty, coauthor of Becoming a Strategic Leader: Your Role in Your Organization’s Enduring Success.

“Leaders today face tremendous pressure to make short-term numbers and show immediate wins,” Beatty says. “Operational leadership rules the day.”

But the pressure to meet short-term targets and solve functional problems is creating a leadership pipeline with limited strategic leadership capacity.

So, how do we lead in ways that position the business for the future while also meeting current demands? It requires developing the following three skills, according to Beatty.

Strategic thinking is grounded in a strong understanding of the complex relationship between the organization and its environment. Strategic thinkers take a broad view; ask probing questions; and identify connections, patterns and key issues. To boost the level of strategic thinking as you or your team work on a challenge, pose these questions: Read more »

Share

Are You Listening?

March 29, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Think about the last time you were talking to someone and they were paying attention.  They seemed to be interested.  They were “connected” with you and “in the moment”.  This is to say they were actually listening.  If you’re lucky enough to have had that experience recently, how’d that make you feel?  I’ll bet most of you are saying things like “honored”, “respected”, “cared about”, “relieved” or even “shocked”.  I get that.  And anyone that has an audience of one or more gets it, too.

You see, I think with the fast pace of society, social networking, texting, etc…, we’ve lost touch with the importance and the “art” of listening.  It takes commitment and time to decipher the words and emotions of the message.  It also takes effort to figure out what might be an underlying meaning of the message. Read more »

Share

Trust

March 14, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Recall the last time someone broke an agreement with you.  Think about how it made you feel in that moment.  It doesn’t matter the size or significance of the agreement.  Any time someone lets you down, it leaves a “mark”.  And while I’d admit that some marks are deeper than others, they’re all marks and will in some way impact the trust you have in that person.

In a book, The Leadership Challenge by Kouses and Posner, a few thousand people were asked about the key qualities of a leader.  Standard answers such as honesty, integrity and trustworthiness were in the top three.  The study proceeded to poll the people that answered trustworthiness and asked how they knew if someone was trustworthy.  Respondents answered “they do what they say they’re going to do”.  It’s just that simple. Read more »

Share

Be Consistent, Be Genuine, and Say It A Lot

February 23, 2011

Posted by in Blog with no comments

Visionary leaders seeking followership take many routes to communicate the direction they and their teams intend to take companies. But certain communication fundamentals need to form the foundation for all methods of communicating a vision and how the company is doing fulfilling it.

Employees follow leaders they trust and who are human. Consistency between word and deed, coupled with being a genuine, empathetic human being, will cause better followership than any other approach. And, visions take time to sink in. Executive teams can often recite a company’s strategy, but is it thoroughly understood and followed by all levels in the organization? Leaders should not grow frustrated that strategies have to be communicated repeatedly before all employees understand how it relates to their world. Be Consistent, Be Genuine, and Say It A Lot!

Share

Time for a change

February 18, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Having witnessed and participated in successful turnarounds over the years, one or both of the following things are needed to realize short term results improvement.
1.) An emergency
2.) A change in leadership
The word “emergency” usually describes something gone awry. The company turned in record losses for the quarter. The key architect of the best-selling offering left the company. The economy is forcing cutbacks. Employee morale has suddenly plummeted. If you consider how the company deals with any of those things, the “emergency” has the possibility of becoming a catalyst to improving results. At the precipice of making the most difficult decisions such as closing a plant for example, strong leadership finds a way to do something beyond the norm to turn things around. The “emergency” many times drives looking outside the box to find a new way to compete or even survive.

A change in leadership, the right kind of leader, can also bring about results improvement in the short term. Effective leaders take advantage of the opportunity to come into a new situation and deal with it quickly. They don’t need motivation from the team. They simply need the courage to make the decisions fast, get things moving in the right direction and turn things around given their new leverage. New leadership can be the key to getting results quickly.

Whether due to an emergency or new leadership, the ground is fertile for quick results improvement. When both occur simultaneously, the chances are far greater for significant improvement in the short term.

Share

Affiliations

IACPR
Pinnacle Society
NAPS

Global Partners

Madison MacArthur
Toronto, Ontario

Our Canadian partner in IRC Global Executive Search was founded in 1994 and was featured in Business Week's Most Influential Headhunters in the World List!



DRH-Talent Search
Sao Paulo, Brazil

Our Brazilian partner in IRC Global Executive Search was founded in 2001. DRH is led by Hamilton Teixeira, a former C-level executive of Kellogg, Bausch & Lomb, Timex, and Rayovac.

Testimonials

Testimonials

Connect With Us!


 

Want to speak with a live person? Call (619) 661-2585 between the hours of 8:30am and 5:30pm (Pacific Standard Time) Monday through Friday.

823 Anchorage Place
Chula Vista, CA, 91914