Posts tagged 'Team':

How Does Leadership Happen?

March 19, 2012

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Cindy McCauley from the Center for Creative Leadership hits the nail on the head
when we she answers the question “How does leadership happen?”  She has a way of simplifying the concept leadership
and the attributes that are apparent when leadership is present.  Without any of the three important outcomes
she speaks of below, leadership just ain’t gonna happen!

In some of my successful assignments in Latin America (Mexico and Puerto
Rico), I may not have realized it, but I was constantly trying to make things
happen.  I realized that we needed
purpose, consistency and commitment to succeed.
Cindy puts another and, I’ll admit, more concise way.  Read on and you’ll see what I mean.

The list of “what makes a good leader” is a long one. “It’s
as if we’ve taken every positive human quality and made it into a requirement
for effective leaders,” says Cindy McCauley.

“It’s time to step back and take a different approach,” McCauley
asserts in Making
Leadership Happen
, a new CCL white paper.

Instead of focusing only on individual leaders and their capabilities, we
need to examine how the whole system is involved in making leadership happen.
We need to look at dynamics like the exchanges between managers and employees,
the interactions among team members, the quality of relationships throughout
the organization and the enactment of organizational processes.

How would you know if leadership is happening in a team, in a workgroup, on
a task force, or across the organization? Look for three important outcomes:
direction, alignment and commitment (DAC).

Direction is agreement on what the group is trying to achieve
together. Alignment is effective coordination and integration of the
different aspects of the work so that it fits together in service of the shared
direction. Commitment is when people are making the success of the
collective (not just their individual success) a personal priority.

“We think the only way to know if leadership has happened is to look
for the presence of these three outcomes,” McCauley explains.

So how do you, a manager, make leadership happen in your organization? Here
are three important strategies:

Pay attention to whether leadership is happening. Start
looking for evidence of DAC. By paying attention to outcomes, you will not only
begin to discern where more leadership is needed, but will also start to see
the kinds of processes and interactions that are producing the desired levels
of direction, alignment and commitment.

Make more leadership happen. First, when you notice that
there aren’t many leadership processes in place, create them. For example, do
you need to meet more regularly with your peers to prioritize work in a
matrixed organization (to create more alignment)?

Second, when there are useful leadership processes in place, make sure
people have the skills to participate in them effectively. When a new strategic
initiative is being launched, will your staff be able to take part in (not just
show up to) the town meetings the CEO is holding (to create more shared
direction)?

And finally, when existing leadership processes no longer seem to be
producing the needed direction, alignment and commitment, explore new ones.
Does a more diverse group of people need to be involved (to create more
direction)? Are more honest conversations about proposed changes needed (to
create more commitment)? Are clearer accountabilities needed (to create more
alignment)?

Improve your own ability to participate in the making of leadership.
Back to those long lists of leader capabilities. It is useful to continue to
deepen and broaden your individual skills and abilities. With a broader
repertoire of capabilities you’ll be able to participate more effectively in a
wide range of leadership processes. Often the difficult question is “Where
should I focus my development efforts?”

One lens for examining this question is DAC. If there was one place in your
organization where you would desperately like to see more DAC, where would that
be? Then what would you need to get better at so that more leadership happens
in that setting?

Finally, don’t undertake these three strategies alone! Talk to people about
where DAC is happening and where it’s not; enlist others in your experiments
with new leadership processes; seek input on how to improve your own
capabilities. Leadership is shared work – at the end of the day, you can only
make it happen with others.

Share

What’s Our Purpose?

March 12, 2012

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Have you ever been assigned to a team and thought it was a waste of your
time? Or been named “team leader,” but unsure where to start? Or
found yourself on a team that’s floundering or falling apart, unable to work
together?  We’ve all been there and done
that.  It’s time to go back to basics.

It may seem impractical in some work settings, but the best thing you can do
is take time to create a team charter.  The
process of talking through the team’s purpose, context, roles and how people
will work together will boost your efficiency in the long run.

A team retreat may feel like a relic from the past in some companies, but
it’s important to set aside several large blocks of time for the team to work
on the charter. During your planning sessions you, or another team leader, will
want to walk members through key questions, capturing responses on flip chart
paper or other visible way. Consider rotating the facilitation and note-taking
roles as team members discuss:

  • Team
    Purpose:
    What kind of team is this (work team, project
    team, management team, coordination team)? Why does the team exist? What
    “work” does the team do? What topics belong “in” this
    team and what’s “out?” What is the team responsible for
    accomplishing?
  • Context:
    Who are we accountable to? With what other groups/teams do we connect?
    What do they want/need from us?
  • Goals:
    What specific results do we expect from our efforts? What outcomes? (cost,
    quality, speed, service, quantity, coordination of X, innovation of X) How
    can we measure that?
  • Roles:
    Who is on the team? What perspective does each member bring? Are there
    special roles (e.g., leader, facilitator, etc?) or sub-groups within this
    team? What do subgroups require of us?
  • Work
    Processes:
    What processes will we use to do the team’s
    work? (step by step) How often will we meet? Who determines and manages
    our agenda? How will we connect with our stakeholders and other sponsors
    of our work?
  • Decision-Making:
    What decisions are made within this team? What is out of bounds? What
    level of decision-making responsibility do we have? What decision process
    will we use?
  • Communication:
    How will we communicate and connect to others within the organization?
  • Norms:
    What do we expect of each other? How do we agree to handle conflict? What
    are our team norms and/or operating principles?

Once you’ve tackled the topics above, have a person or subgroup combine the
team’s agreements into a single document. A written team charter can be
creatively displayed in your team’s work area, posted electronically and
referred to in meetings and discussions.

Periodically, the team will want to go back to the charter and consider
these questions:

  • How well
    did our work actually reflect our stated purpose? Did we get distracted or
    did we stay true to our purpose?
  • How well
    did we meet the needs of this team? Did we meet stakeholders’
    expectations? Did we coordinate well with others who rely on our work?
  • Did we
    reach our intended goals? Do the measured results of our work demonstrate
    that? What got in the way of us being as successful as we might have been?
  • How clear
    were roles on this team? Did we make good use of a variety of
    perspectives? Were roles executed well?
  • Were our
    work processes effective? Did we stick to what we had agreed to in our
    charter? Why not? What new processes might help us be more effective?
  • Were
    decisions made efficiently and effectively? Did we include the right
    amount of input? What surprises or frustrations did we encounter, if any?
    How might we do it differently?
  • How well
    did our communication plan work? Did we stick to it? What methods worked
    particularly well? Where did we not do so well?
  • How well
    did we live within the norms we created? Did they help us achieve our
    objectives? What norms do we want to add? Delete? How can we be better in
    the future?

I risk overstating the obvious in this posting, but sometimes going back to
basics makes sense.  I think of resources
on teams as sharp arrows.  They may be
the best at what they do, but if they’re pointed in multiple directions instead
of at the target, our chances of success diminish dramatically.

Share

Getting More

August 8, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

One night, in the early 1990s, American businessman Stuart Diamond stood in a Bolivian jungle
clearing amidst a group of impoverished Indian farmers. He was there to make a
deal: He wanted the farmers to stop growing coca (the plant used in the
production of cocaine) and instead grow bananas that he and his colleagues
would export. Wearing a three-piece suit, tie and suspenders, Diamond looked at
the farmers in their tattered rags and said, through an interpreter (the
farmers spoke Qetchua, an Indian dialect), “Look at me. You and I couldn’t
be more different. I dress differently. I talk differently. I look different.
My plane ticket down here probably cost more than many of you make in a year.
But I think we have some things in common. We both want a better life for
ourselves and our children. And if we work together, we just might be able to
do something together.” Read more »

Share

Make ‘em Laugh

June 8, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Humor in the workplace is priceless.  After all, employees around you are spending time with you away from their families or away from some of the things in life they’d rather be doing.  Investing in the relationship with them using humor will help employees, peers and customers alike.  Why?  For two reasons:

  1. Humor helps build a productive environment.  Any team that uses humor as a way to stay relaxed is building an environment of confidence and trust.  Confidence comes from those around you seeing you as “one of them”.  Humor helps to grow this confidence.  Self deprecating humor, to a degree, is helpful for this confidence, too…  especially from the leader.   We are more approachable when humor is used and being approachable is an important step toward building trust.
  2. Humor helps to build rapport in relationships.  Rapport is the connection it takes to work together.  It’s the comfort level that comes about when teammates are communicating.  Simply put, injecting humor in the workplace helps people feel more comfortable to share what’s on their mind and get ideas out there.

Read more »

Share

Collaboration or Consensus?

April 29, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

We spend a lot of time in meetings trying to make decisions on key projects that will move the organization in the direction we’d like it to go.  Can you relate?  One thing we all have in common is we never have enough time to explore options to make the right decisions.  Well, I say that because I believe it’s our lack of willingness to invest the right amount of time up front that sets us back.  We tend to settle on consensus rather than collaboration because of a lack of time.  It’s almost always better to spend time to get the right answer rather than the fast answer.

Let’s break down the key differences between consensus and collaboration.  Consensus comes from the Latin word consentire (to act together).  It’s a great example of a word that’s been misused over time.  Compromise in reality is often what’s happening.  Most people when they hear the word think of something positive or productive.  Actually, it’s a way to expedite the process of making a decision by settling for a vote or summary judgment of some kind.  When that happens, the ideas on the table cease to be explored and the team is off and running on the decision based on a consensus opinion.  Here’s the catch.  Read more »

Share

Coaching: What it is and what it isn’t

April 7, 2011

Posted by in Blog, Thought Leadership with no comments

Think about one of the great coaches you’ve been involved with.  This could have been in sports, at work or at home.  As you bring this person to mind, think about what you noticed about them that made them great in your point of view.  You may have noticed that they were motivational, positive and action-driven.  If so, you’re not alone.  These are the qualities we look for in coaches.

Coaches are motivational.  I’ve heard many times that people can’t be motivated.  All we can do as leaders or coaches is set the stage or the environment so that they can motivate themselves.  While I agree with this to an extent, I also believe that coaches can be motivational by challenging people to get to where they want to go.  They can do this by example or they can do this by helping focus the individual on what they want at work, at home or in life in general.  It’s in our nature to dwell on things as they are.  By doing so, we aren’t doing things to get to the where we want to be instead.  While it may be therapeutic at times to complain about how things are, too much of it is a bad thing.  Coaches can be a great asset to help us focus on the future and get over things in the past. Read more »

Share

Tough Discussions with Employees (fourth in a series)

April 4, 2011

Posted by in Blog with no comments

This fourth post on the topic of difficult discussions focuses on how to recognize and deal with stubborn or indifferent employees.
“An army is a team. It lives, eats, sleeps, and fights as a team.”,
announced George C. Scott in his portrayal of General George S. Patton who went on to achieve great things by leveraging teamwork and camaraderie.

Granted, a company is not an army that is fighting a war, but companies do need employees that are unified on strategy and purpose And, let’s face it: the words “team” and “teamwork” are so pervasive in corporate-speak and business literature that some even shun the words as rhetorical or think, “Oh, here comes another push to make us work together. Everything is fine.”

The trouble is, not everything is fine. If only we could measure the lost productivity caused by sub-optimized teams and select team members, particularly the stubborn or indifferent. Read more »

Share

Anything Is Possible

January 21, 2011

Posted by in Blog with no comments

The senior business leaders that we work with encounter difficult challenges every day, but it seems about every quarter or so a challenge or lofty goal emerges that tests the mettle of their extended team. EMPATHY helps this situation. The group or individual tasked with solving great challenges or delivering on stretch goals needs to hear their leadership verbally express an understanding of the difficulties facing the team. Hearing this and knowing that the leadership is empathetic can boost their confidence by knowing that management isn’t out of touch. Think about Kennedy’s charge to NASA when he said, “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.”

Share

Affiliations

IACPR
Pinnacle Society
NAPS

Global Partners

Madison MacArthur
Toronto, Ontario

Our Canadian partner in IRC Global Executive Search was founded in 1994 and was featured in Business Week's Most Influential Headhunters in the World List!



DRH-Talent Search
Sao Paulo, Brazil

Our Brazilian partner in IRC Global Executive Search was founded in 2001. DRH is led by Hamilton Teixeira, a former C-level executive of Kellogg, Bausch & Lomb, Timex, and Rayovac.

Testimonials

Testimonials

Connect With Us!


 

Want to speak with a live person? Call (619) 661-2585 between the hours of 8:30am and 5:30pm (Pacific Standard Time) Monday through Friday.

823 Anchorage Place
Chula Vista, CA, 91914